Message From Michael
June 15, 2010
ILLEGITIMI NON CARBORUNDUM
IGNORANCE IS BLISS
YOU TALK TOO MUCH
YOU WORRY ME TO DEATH
CHICKEN LITTLE MAY HAVE BEEN RIGHT
We encourage people to pass on copies of Message from Michael. But if you would like to get your own copy, you can subscribe by sending an e-mail to Michael@MediaConsultant.tv with the word “subscribe-MM” in the subject line.
ILLEGITIMI NON CARBORUNDUM: That’s more or less what the rest of the world had to say when it came to the Internet. Because basically to get from Point A to Point B on the Internet, you needed to know Latin. Okay, not really, but sort of. All domain names are Latin – meaning basically English or European. So, for example, the citizen journalism site OhMyNews (which recently celebrated its 10th Birthday) has a dot-com extension, even though the site itself is in Korean. (There is an excellent English version.) The group that oversees all domain names, ICANN, (Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers), has approved the first set of Internationalized Domain names (IDN), which means that soon we will see domain names in Arabic, Russian, Chinese and Indian languages. Think that’s not such a big deal? Well, the folks at ICANN say it is the “biggest technical change” to the Internet since its birth 40 years ago. Why? Think of this. In
IGNORANCE IS BLISS. The vast majority of Americans (91%) are satisfied with their broadband speed and a significant majority (71%) believe that they are getting the broadband speed their provider is promising either “always” or “most of the time,” according to a survey by the Federal Communication Commission. Now, those figures would be interesting enough on their own, but what makes them particularly interesting is another figure from the survey – 80% don’t even know what their broadband speed is. (Ergo – my headline.) The survey is part of the federal government’s effort to develop a national Broadband plan. So, what next? Well, for starters, the FCC is offering consumers a way to test their Internet speed from their website http://www.broadband.gov. But to do so, you must fill out a form, explaining whether you are accessing from your home or business, what size is the business and what is the actual specific street address. Harmless enough, as the CommLawBlog from the telecommunications law firm of Fletcher, Heald and Hildreth notes. Except that when you read the fine print, the firm says, there are eight instances in which the FCC can disclose the information you provide – none of which require a warrant or subpoena but which cover a very broad legal ground. And, of course, as most message readers know, there are a dozen or more ways to test your Internet speed. None of which requires any disclosure of information. But it gets better. Despite the recent controversy about privacy, the FCC is looking for 10,000 volunteers willing to put a box in their home so the federal government can monitor “every bit and byte of their home Web use,” as MIT’s Technology Review puts it, with the additional commentary about what an “audacious” request that is. And it keeps getting better. The box? It’s called “Sam Knows Whitebox.” As the CommLawBlog author notes, “we couldn’t make this stuff up.” BTW, if you’re interested, the FCC volunteer-seeking website is https://www.testmyisp.com.
SIDENOTE – PERSPECTIVE: Some facts and figures to put this in perspective. Two-thirds of the
Okay, I know I bombard people with too many numbers some times in the message, but one more set of figures to add perspective. According to the
FOOTNOTE: A group of powerful tech and media companies have formed a coalition they call the Broadband Internet Technical Advisory Group. And when we say powerful… well, here are some of the members: Google, Microsoft, Cisco, Comcast, TimeWarner, Intel, EchoStar and Verizon. The stated purpose is to develop broadband management techniques and deal with technical issues that “can affect Internet users’ experience.” Not to be outdone, the FCC has created its own select group of invitation-only broadband engineers to a brainstorming session later this month on how to use broadcast spectrum for broadband service.
YOU TALK TOO MUCH. At least that’s what AT&T has said to some users, instituting a tiered payment system for iPhone users based on how much data they think they will use. This is somewhat similar to the plan AT&T and Comcast both have toyed with, to cap bandwidth users. But so far, no howls of indignation about the IPhone plan. Even Consumer Reports gave the plan its blessing (sort of), noting that only four percent of IPhone users consumer more than a gigabyte of data month. But, observers note that as the data-chomping iPad begins eating up more bandwidth, the tune may change. And that’s only the start of it. Internet equipment and backbone supplier Cisco says Internet traffic will quadruple by the year 2014. The company projects traffic of 64 Exabytes of data per month by then, most of it (91%, to be exact) video. But better than the data and numbers supplied by the company are the factoids – and you know, how I love factoids. The company says that by 2014 it would take more than two years to watch all the video crossing the Global IP network… in just in one second. To watch ALL the video crossing IP networks that year would take 72 Million years. Internet provider Akamai has its own version of web traffic monitoring on its State of the Internet website which, when I checked it, showed that there were 346,000 people listening to music at that very minute worldwide, another 3,352,000 people worldwide shopping (or at least visiting retail sites); and news sites (as defined by Akamai) were averaging more than 5,712,000 visitors a minute worldwide.
YOU WORRY ME TO DEATH. That’s the next line in the Clarence Carter song (did anybody catch it?). And the growth in the Internet has many people worried because, for one thing, along with that increased usage comes an increase in “attack traffic”, according to Akamai’s State of the Internet report for the fourth quarter of 2009 (the latest I could find.) As in previous reports,
CHICKEN LITTLE MAY HAVE BEEN RIGHT. The sky is falling. It’s official. The Pentagon says so. The problem is that there is so much space junk (old rockets, abandoned satellites and missile shrapnel) and so many satellites that there is a logjam in space. In an article in The Washington Post, Indian rocket scientist Bharath Gopalaswamy estimates there are 370,000 ‘pieces of junk’ in low orbit, flying around with 1,100 satellites. The recent report of a drifting satellite threatening other satellites is peanuts compared to an incident three years ago. According to the Pentagon report, a Chinese missile test destroyed a satellite in 2007, leaving 150,000 pieces of junk behind. The Washington Post article puts the “space-services” market at $250 Billion, between financial communication, GPS, and international phones.
SUBSCRIPTIONS: If you wish to stop receiving this newsletter, e-mail Michael@MediaConsultant.tv with the word “unsubscribe-MM” in the subject line. Also, back issues of MfM are available at the website, media-consultant.blogspot.com. You can reach me directly at Michael@MediaConsultant.tv.
No comments:
Post a Comment